&
The Law of First Mention
When GOD gave authority to someone in Scripture, HE changed the name of that person.
1. GOD renamed Abram to Abraham when He made him the 'Father of a Multitude of Nations', in Gen 17:5. HE gave Abraham 'primacy' over all other men.
2. GOD renamed Sara to Sarah when HE made her the 'Mother of Nations' in Gen 17:15-16. HE gave Sarah 'primacy' over all other women.
3. GOD renamed Jacob to Israel, the name of the Jewish Nation, and Jacob became the first Israeli in Gen 32:29.
4. GOD renamed Simon to Peter in Matt 16:18, thus giving him 'primacy' over all of the Apostles. Why else would GOD give a new name to Simon?
The 'Law of First Mention' as applied to Abraham, Sarah, and Israel, works very well indeed. Why then do some believe it does not work for Simon-Peter?
Matthew 16:13-17...
Jesus said, "Who do men say the Son of Man is?" (13)
But they said, "Some say, John the Baptist; and others Elias; and others
Jeremias,
or one of the prophets." (14)
He said to them, "But who do YOU say that I am?" (15)
Simon Peter answered and said, "Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living GOD."
(16)
Then Jesus answered and said, "Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona, for flesh and
blood has
not revealed this to thee, but My Father in Heaven."
(17)
This verse expresses a blessing for Peter from the Son.
Did you notice that Peter was the only Apostle who knew who Jesus Christ was?
All of the rest expressed an opinion.
GOD the Father, Himself, told Peter alone, and not one of the other Apostles.
It was a blessing for Peter from the Father.
This is a clear sign of the Primacy of Peter from the Father.
John 21:1-11...
Acts 15:7, during the first Church Council, the Council
of Jerusalem...
And after a long debate, Peter got up and said to them,
"Brethren, you know that in early days GOD made choice among us, that through MY
mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the Gospel and believe."
Who made the choice? GOD did. Who did GOD choose? He chose Peter. Now that is
primacy.
Some detractors of Peter's primacy try to show that James (Acts 15:13-21), held
the primacy simply because he was the Bishop of Jerusalem. Well, he may have
been the Bishop of Jerusalem during this Council, but Peter was the Bishop of
the whole world. See Acts 1:8, where Jerusalem was only one of many
Church locations to be founded by the Apostles. The books
of Acts, Revelation, and a few others, record more than 30 additional locations
for the Church other than Jerusalem.
Jerusalem would certainly not even have
been considered by the Apostles to be the seat of Christianity, as they had been
forewarned by Jesus Himself that the city would soon be totally destroyed. This
prophecy was fulfilled in 70 A.D. when Roman legions did indeed destroy it.
See Matthew 24 beginning with verse 15.
Eusebius (263-339) Bishop of Caesarea and known as "The Father of Church
History", wrote in 'The History of the Church' volume 2 chapter 1, "But Clement
in the sixth book of his Hypotyposes writes thus: 'For they say that Peter and
James and John after the ascension of our Saviour, as if also preferred by our
Lord, strove not after honor, but chose James the Just bishop of Jerusalem'."
The names of Peter, which include Simon and Cephas, are
mentioned more times in the New Testament than any other Apostle.
"Of Peter the most is known. Peter is mentioned 195 times, the rest of the
Apostles only 130 times. The one mentioned next in frequency to Peter is John,
to whom there are 29 references."
Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, "Life of Christ", page 106.
The name James, is mentioned a total of 38 times and of that number there were 2
persons, James the Greater, and James the Less. So if James the Less is said to
have the primacy, then why is he mentioned so few times compared to Peter?
Every time the names of the Apostles are listed, except for Gal 2:9, his name
appears first. In Mt 10:2 it even says that Peter is first, "Now these are the
names of the twelve Apostles: first Simon, who is called Peter,...". See
also Mk 3:16, Lk 6:13-14, and Acts 1:13.
Peter's name appears first also when 3 or 4 of the Apostles are listed: Mt 17:1,
Mk 5:37, Mk 9:2,
Mk 13:3, Mk 14:33, Lk 5:8-10, Lk 8:51, Lk 9:28.
As for Gal 2:9, it was customary then, as it is to this very day, to name the
Bishop of the Diocese first. If the Pope visited a Diocese, the Bishop would be
named ahead of him as it is the proper protocol. In Gal 2, Peter was visiting
Jerusalem, as verses 1-8 show.
It never ceases to amaze me that those who deny the Primacy of Peter, will
invariably point to this one and only verse where Peter is named second and will
completely ignore the many verses which list his name first. If James held the
primacy as some would like us to believe, then why is he mentioned first in only
one single verse?
Throughout our salvation history, GOD has always provided a 'Father Figure' to
guide His people. Some examples are, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David,
Solomon, and Peter and the succession of Popes.