Do Catholics and Muslims worship the same God?
By Raymond Taouk
“The holy universal Church teaches that it is not possible to worship God truly except in her" - Pope Gregory XVI [1]
The false notion that all religions who give homage to a deity of any sort somehow worship the true "God" but simply "under another form" is one that is presently being propagated in order lead the Church down the smooth path of apostasy in the name of ecumenism.
The Catholic position on this is precisely opposed to this proposition, which is set forth by the modernist element in the Catholic hierarchy today.
Objectively:
From a purely objective point of view, regardless of the doctrinal teaching professed by Mohammedans and Catholics, it is evident that Almighty God is the God over both. God exists. His existence is not dependent on the acknowledgement of mankind that He exists. Nor is God's existence dependent upon any religion. He is the Creator and the Providence of the Universe: the whole of creation, the entire cosmos, of all existing things, whether they be angels, human beings, animals or plants, animate or inanimate. He is also the Savior and the Judge of the living and the dead, having redeemed mankind and must judge Catholics and Mohammedans, believers and atheists. Their god is but another strange god. On every essential point concerning the true God and the nature of the true God, the Mohammedan belief radically and seriously conflicts with the established and revealed Dogma of the Catholic Church.
Subjectively:
Again from a purely subjective thinking the Muslims might think and believe with a firm confidence that they are worshiping the true God, "Allah" yet the reality is quite the contrary as objectively speaking we can only affirm the contrary. This point is clear from Scripture "Whosoever does not continue in the doctrine of Christ does not have God". - II St. Jn 1:9
The teaching and the beliefs of Catholicism and Mohammedanism are different and contrary. Their concept of, and their approach to God, diverge and conflict. Catholics indeed accept as dogmatic truth the Holy Trinity, the Incarnation and the Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Moslems vehemently and vociferously deny the Blessed Trinity [2], the Incarnation [3], the Crucifixion of our Divine Lord and the Divinity of Christ [4]. The Mohammedans have such a carnal notion of heaven that St. Alphonsus did not hesitate to declare "The Mohammedan Paradise, is only fit for beasts; for filthy sensual pleasure is all the believer has to expect there." [5]
The Catholic and Christian God is 'The Trinity,' and our Lord Jesus Christ, the second Person of that Trinity, is the Creator and One true and merciful God. Despite monotheistic appearances, we do not have the same God; we do not have the same mediator. How then can it be that " together with us they (The Moslems) adore the one, merciful God." [6] This is incredible!
The Catholic Teaching: "Without faith it is impossible to please God." - Heb. 11:6
Mohammedans are infidels for "broadly speaking, infidels are those who do not possess the true faith; while in the strict sense infidels are the un-baptized"[7]. They are divided into monotheists (Jews and Moslems), polytheists (Hindus, Buddhists, etc.), and atheists.
From a Catholic perspective the Islamic worship is another form of false worship given to a "strange god" for as we read in scripture "All the gods of the Nations are Idols" - I Para 16:26
It would be blasphemous to declare that these false religions are the working of God. On the Contrary ''all faithful disciples of Jesus Christ well know that the false religions are only instruments of the devil to deceive souls and place them beyond Salvation" - [8a]
Pope Pius X long ago put forward that the modernist if they take logically there doctrine, would have no grounds for denying the Muslims there "experience" of " god" as being just as valid as that of another "believer" and hence he states:
"Here it is well to note at once that, given this doctrine of experience united with that of symbolism, every religion, even that of paganism, must be held to be true. What is to prevent such experiences from being found in any religion? In fact, that they are so is maintained by not a few. On what grounds can Modernists deny the truth of an experience affirmed by a follower of Islam? [8b]
What a prophetic insight, Pope Pius X was so accurate that not even the Modernist came to deny what he stated, but only affirm the above with great audacity.
The Baltimore Catechism (No. 3) states as follows:
Q. 1148. How do we offer God false worship?
A. We offer God false worship by rejecting the religion He has instituted
and following one pleasing to ourselves, with a form of worship He has never
authorized, approved or sanctioned.
Islam clearly comes under the notion of false worship which the Church has never authorized or sanctioned. For this reason does Pope Gregory XVI affirm that
The psalmist tells us that "All the Gods of the Gentiles are Devils" (Psalm 96:5) and hence to whom do they render their worship? The Scriptures tell us clearly " They provoked him by strange gods, and stirred him up to anger, with their abominations. They sacrificed to devils and not to God: to gods whom they knew not: that were newly come up, whom their fathers worshipped not. " (Deut 32:16- 17 Cf. also Baruch 4:7)
They "sacrificed to devils and not to God" - regardless of whether or not they might have believed they were rendering homage to the True God, the reality is quite the contrary! It is an erroneous proposition to qualify a prayer addressed to the devil as authentic prayer.
Islam is a false Religion. A false religion is any non-Christian religion "in so far as it is not the religion that God revealed and wants to see practiced. Moreover, every non-Catholic Christian sect is false in so far as it neither accepts nor faithfully practices the entire content of Revelation." [9]
Christ tells us who the true worshipers shall be: "But the hour cometh and now is, when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and in truth." (Jn. 4:23).
These words go directly against the terminology now used by the modernist hierarchy. They speak from a subjective position wishing to dogmatize and "opinion" which goes directly against the mind of the Church on this point. In fact Pope Gregory XVI is quite clear in this regard as he clearly states that “the true worship of God, is unique to the Catholic religion." - Summo Iugiter Studio (# 6), May 27, 1832
This religious subjectivism, which she has always condemned under the names of indifferentism or latitudinarianism, and which "seeks to justify itself under the pretended claims of liberty, failing to recognize the rights of objective truth which are made manifest either by the lights of reason or by Revelation." [10]
This subjectivism only leads to that Religious indifferentism, which is "one of the most deleterious heresies" and which "places all religions on an equal footing," inevitably leads one to consider the truth of religious belief as merely a matter of utility for a well-regulated life.... "One ends by considering religion as an entirely individual thing which can be adapted to the dispositions of each one, letting everyone form his own personal religion, and by concluding that all the religions are good even though they contradict each other." [11]
The Church is not concerned with the subjective dispositions of men. This is for God to Judge. The Church is concerned with objective facts. Her judgments are objective. Pope St. Pius X, for this reason declared that "those who die as infidels are damned." [11a]
1907 “In answer to a question as to whether Confucius could have been saved,wrote:’It is not allowed to affirm that Confucius was saved. Christians, when interrogated, must answer that those who die as infidels are damned.’ ”
Revelation is a reality, a fact, a truth accredited by God by sure signs. This revelation of God can in no way be placed on the same footing as those erroneous beliefs of infidels. We may say that the Mohammedans worship a false god, the god of their own making, which a deviation from the right worship of the true God.
Further we might rightly ask with St. Paul, "How then shall they call upon Him in whom they have not believed?" - Rom 10: 14
Although the modern terminology used might not seem to be "explicitly heretical" in nevertheless leads one down this path to apostasy. This vague terminology, which has been employed to put forward an erroneous notion of the faith so that we may be deceived along the path of syncretism. Yves Marsaudon, in his book Ecumenism as seen by a Traditional Freemason, commented favorably on the ecumenism that was nurtured at Vatican II. He said:
"Catholics and especially the conservatives must not forget that all roads lead to God. And they will have to accept that this courageous idea of free-thinking, which we can really call a revolution, pouring forth from our Masonic lodges has spread magnificently over the dome of Saint Peter’s." [12]
This is precisely path of deception to which the enemies of the Church hope to direct her. For this reason St. Pius X, who could see where this disorientation in precise terminology was leading, required every would-be Catholic priest to recite the following words at the feet of his Ordinary:
"I condemn and reject premises from which it follows that dogmas are either false or doubtful". [13]
The Council of Florence, clearly sets down the four notes of heresy as follows:
1) a pertinacious adherence to teachings expressly contradictory to that which has been defined by the Church;
2) an opinion opposed to a doctrine not explicitly defined by the Church nor clearly proposed dogmatically as an article of Faith;
3) a proposition that, although not directly contradictory to the Faith, nonetheless necessarily entails logical consequences against it; and
4) a speculation which reaches a certain degree of probability of being against the Faith.
The Modernist's in using these subjective terms to formulate their erroneous notions that "We together with the Muslims worship the same God" go directly against the above statements of the Council of Florence. This formulation works directly against the Churches dogma "Outside the Church there is No Salvation" [14].
Although it is true to say that the reason that those outside the Church are not saved is not purely because they worship a false 'god' nevertheless there is still a clear connection. When Christ states, "No one comes to the Father but through me" (Jn. 14:6), this precisely means, if you don't posses Christ, you can't posses the Father (God) for Christ is that door to the Father. Hence without Christ there is no salvation from God. The relation is evident. Again this is confirmed by St. Irenaeus who wrote, "Thus, without the Holy Spirit, we cannot see the Word of God; and without the Son no one can go to the Father." [15a]
Pope Pius XI declares the same saying that "In her (the Catholic Church) alone is Christ believed with a faith whole and entire, worshiped with sincere homage of adoration, and loved with the constant flame of ardent Charity" [15c]
What happened to the 1st Commandment?
If all religions worship the true God by simply claiming to be doing so, then one could not violate the 1st Commandment since all worship of any “god” would be tantamount to worshiping the true "God" according to the post the modernist element in the hierarchy, yet this would not only render the 1st Commandment obsolete but make it seem as though God had given us and absurd command. God does not command anything in vain.
The first commandment is not optional. A man cannot worship in any way that which he does not believe in, for the Law of Praying determines the law of believing, and vice-versa. If Mohammedans believe in a one-person deity, that is what they worship, and in no way can we logically argue that they worship with us the Holy Trinity.
We are not unfamiliar with the notion that claims that they implicitly worship the trinity, yet we cannot maintain this from an objective stand point for the simple reason that we can not hold that one worships implicitly what he explicitly rejects.
In our day and age it is often too easily forgotten that all non-Catholic
worship is offensive to God and clearly violates the first commandment. This is
because the "first commandment may be broken by giving to a creature the honor
which belongs to God alone or by false worship." [16a]
The Church has always regarded the worship of Non Catholics as mere acts of superstitions since "there are four kinds of superstition, namely, illegitimate worship of the true God, idolatry, divination, and superstitious practices. The first consists in a false worship, though applied to the living God; for instance, if you worship Him (God) according to the Mosaic law, which is contrary to all the precepts of the Gospel; or if you adopt a new religion in opposition to the doctrine if the universal Church." [16c] Hence it is clear that "any public worship of the true God, outside the Catholic Church constitutes a superstitious worship of God as no other Church is authorized to give public worship to God. [16d]
Religion has an intellectual foundation, that is, it is based on knowledge. To be true religion its basis must be truth. The basis must be true both speculatively and practically. In other words, true religion must be based on a correct knowledge of God as existing and worthy of all honor, and of the manner and obligation of worshipping Him. On the other hand, religion is false if what is not God is considered to be God, and worshipped as God, or if there is error in the worship of the true God. Therefore, God is not truly worshipped when erroneous signs are used in His worship, as those of the Jews, or when superfluous ceremonies are employed, as by pagans and many heretics. [16e]
Although subjectively, it is the virtue of religion which prompts a man to render to God the worship and reverence that is His by right. [16f]
It is to be noted that an act based on a false religion cannot be really an act of virtue. For a virtue requires a morally good work. But in the cult (worship) of a false god, or in the false and superstitious worship of the true God, there can be no moral goodness, since such worship is opposed to right reason. [16g]
St. Pope Pius X, truly the Pope of our Age, could see where such absurd reason of the Modernists was leading the Church as he affirmed:
"... a great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a One-World Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy, nor discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions, and which, under the pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world the reign of legalized cunning and force, the oppression of the weak, and of those who toil and suffer." [17a]
One of the greatest frauds presented to us by a great number of the current hierarchy is the false notion of ecumenism, which in reality is not ecumenism but simple "syncretism" going by the name of "ecumenism. True Ecumenism requires all those outside the Church to come to the Ark of Salvation so that they may not perish.
True ecumenism can be effectively defined as follows:
"The unity of Christians cannot otherwise be obtained than by securing the return of the separated to the one true Church of Christ from which they once unhappily withdrew. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, that stands forth before all and that by the will of its Founder will remain forever the same as when He Himself established it for the salvation of all mankind." [18]
This has been the constant teaching of the Church. Holy Mother Church has always taught that true unity cannot be effected, except by a unity in faith and government. [19]
Pope Pius IX condemned in his syllabus of errors the following false notions:
"Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true." (Proposition XV).
"Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation and arrive at eternal salvation." (Proposition XVI).
The real problem with this false ecumenism (which lead to indifferentism) is not only the fact that Catholics are being deceived but in the same process so are the infidels and non-believers and they sadly continue on the road to perdition without being told to recant their errors.
Catholics often forget that those faithful living on earth come under the title of "Church Militant". What is a Catholic who does not confess his faith or worse yet a Catholic who does not believe his faith?
St. Peter Canisius puts it this way: "Who is to be called a Christian? He who
confesses the doctrine of Christ and His Church. Hence, he is truly a Christian
thoroughly condemns and detests, the Jewish, Mohammedan, and the heretical cults
and sects." [20]
What did St. Peter Mavimenus tell the Mohammedans? Did he say, "We worship the same God, all is well" No! He told them the truth, he put it this way to them "Whoever does not embrace the Catholic Christian religion will be damned, as was your false prophet Mohammed." [21]
St. Alphonsus attests to the fact how the Holy Monk St. Goerge of San Saba openly confessed to the Mohammedans: "But the holy monk (St. George of San Saba) having declared that Mahomet was a disciple of the devil, and that his followers were in a state of perdition, he also was condemned (to martyrdom) with his companions." [23]
The same we read in the testimony of the five disciples of St. Francis of Assisi, who when reproached by the followers of Koran for preaching against Mohammed, simply responded by saying "We have come to preach faith in Jesus Christ to you, that you will renounce Mohammad, that wicked slave of the devil, and obtain everlasting life like us" [23a]
Further we read in the life of St. John Vianney how he stated openly to a Protestant who believed that his worship rendered to God should do him just as well in his Protestant Sect as it would have in the Catholic faith, The Saint responded to him with the contrary advice saying "My friend, there are not two ways of serving Our Lord; there is only one good way, and it is to serve Him as He wishes to be served".[24]
This is the truth we must speak in charity and
honesty to these lost souls who without the grace and redemption of Christ can't
be saved for by nature, men are "children of wrath" (Eph. 2:3); by Him, we have
been reconciled with the Father (Col. 1:20), and it is only by faith in Him that
we can have the boldness to approach God with entire confidence (Eph. 3:12). To
Him was given all power in heaven and on earth (Mt. 28:18), and at His name
every knee must bend, in heaven, on earth, and under the earth (Phil. 2:10,11).
No one goes to the Father save by Him (Jn. 14:6), and there is no other name
under heaven given to man by which he must be saved (Acts 4:12). He is the Light
that enlightens every man who comes into the world (Jn.1:9), and whoever does
not follow Him wanders in darkness (Jn. 8:12). Who is not with Him is against
Him (Mt. 13:30), and who does not honor Him also dishonors His Father who sent
Him (as the Jews do) (Jn. 5:23).
Christ says, " Do you think I came to bring peace
on earth? No I tell you but division?" With the truth, division must come. This
should not dishearten the man of God for "If God is for us, who is against us" -
Rom 8:31
Salvation and Ignorance-
“He that doth not believe is already judged." Jn,
3:18; Mk 16:16
Although the Church makes a distinction between
voluntary infidels in which one knowingly rejects the faith and involuntary
infidels in which the offender is ignorant of the true faith.
Those who are not guilty of the sin of infidelity,
but commit other grievous sins, are all those un-baptized persons who never had
an opportunity of knowing the true religion, or of becoming aware of the
obligation of seeking and embracing it, but who do not live up to the dictates
of their conscience. This class of infidels will be lost, not on account of
their infidelity, which was no sin for them, but on account of other grievous
sins, which they committed against their conscience. "For whosoever have sinned
without the law," says Saint Paul, "shall perish without the law." [27]
In fact, the infidels who are not lost because of
the sin of incredulity, that is, by the sin of not having believed in Christ
about whom they never knew anything, are lost by their other sins, the remission
of which cannot be given to anyone without the true faith. Those infidels who
are not guilty of the sin of infidelity and are faithful in obeying the voice of
their conscience, Saint Thomas Aquinas says: "If anyone was brought up in the
wilderness or among brute beasts, and if he followed the law of nature to desire
what is good, and to avoid what is wicked, we should certainly believe that God,
by an inward inspiration, would reveal to him what he should believe, or would
send someone to preach the Faith to him, as He sent Peter to Cornelius."
Further Fr. Michael Müller, C.SS.R in dealing with
the issue states: "A Mohammedan is taught by his conscience that it would be a
crime to believe in Jesus Christ, and not believe in Mahomet; will this impious
conscience save him? The Scripture assures us that 'there is no other name given
to men under heaven by which we can be saved,' but the name of Jesus only; and
'he that believeth not the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God
remaineth on him." [28]
This should not surprise us since "what can be
more contrary to reason than to be an infidel and not care to be under the
sentence of eternal damnation" [29] Yes it is wholly against reason to
place our faith in the testimony of a deceiver and murder as Mohammed manifested
himself to have been. For this reason St. Thomas says "those who place faith in
his (Mohammed's) words believe foolishly" [30]
Without the faith they can't be saved. Our Lord Jesus Christ is not optional.
Attendance at Islamic and Non-Catholic Worship
The abomination, which the Church has had from the
very beginning for association of Catholics in the worship of Non Catholics [31],
is evident from the words of St. John "If anyone comes to you and does not bring
this doctrine, do not receive him into the house, or say to him Welcome" - II
John 1:10
Suarez (one of the greatest amongst the Jesuits
theologians) affirms that the reason the Apostle gives for this prohibition is
verified in religious communication especially, because he, who unites himself
with those outside the Church in religious worship, communicates in their wicked
works. [32]
A Catholic who communicates formally in the
worship of Non Catholics sins grievously against the virtue of Religion, as a
false exercise of it. [33] For this reason "One is never allowed to
cooperate formally in something which is intrinsically wrong objectively." [34]
St. Augustine, the great Champion of Catholic
orthodoxy, reproves both actual and simulated communication in non-Catholic
worship. In a letter to St. Jerome he states that one who observes the rites of
Jews, or Gentiles, not only truly, but even fictitiously, has fallen into the
abyss of the devil. [35]
The mind of the Church on this point was enshrined
in old Code of Canon Law (1917), which stated that: " It is not permitted at all
for the faithful to assist in any active manner at or to have any part in the
worship of non-Catholics." [36]
All subsequent moral theology works have simply
reiterated the same point. [37]
Pius XI in dealing with this issue that was so
vehement in his own day had only the following to say "Certainly such movements
as these cannot gain the approval of Catholics. They are founded upon the false
opinions of those who say that, since all religions equally unfold and signify-
though not in the same way - the native, inborn feeling in us all through which
we are borne toward God and humbly recognize His rule, therefore, all religions
are more or less good and praiseworthy. The followers of this theory are not
only deceived and mistaken, but since they repudiate the true religion by
attacking it in its very essence, they move step by step toward naturalism and
atheism. Hence it clearly follows that anyone who gives assent to such theories
and undertakings utterly abandons divinely revealed religion. " [38]
The Church can never lawfully grant to Catholics
permission to participate formally in non-Catholic worship. In dealing those who
claim they have been given ecclesiastical permission to participate in the
ceremonial rites of non Catholics Fr. Michael Muller in his well known work,
"God the Teacher of Man Kind" aptly answers the question by stating "Neither any
priest nor bishop, nay, not even the Pope, can give you permission to violate
any of the commandments." [39]
It has been rashly stated the Mohammedans and other infidels adore the same God "together with us" [40] yet not only is this undoubtibly offensive to Catholic doctrine (as we have shown above) but it shows forth an ignorance of Islamic notion of God and their absurd doctrines. Mohammedans don't pray to their god, together with us, they pray to their false god against us! The Quran is explicit on this point as it openly states: "The Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before, may Allah destroy them, how they have turned away." [41]
Ultimately we can do no better than assume to
ourselves the advice of the Apostle of the Gentiles (St. Paul) himself "Bear
not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with
injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath
Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? And what
agreement hath the temple of God with idols?" - II Cor. 6: 14-18.
Foot Notes:
1Pope Gregory XVI - Summo
Jugiter Studio, May 27, 1832
2. Sura iv. 171
3. Sura xxiii. 91
4. Sura iv, 157 and Sura v. 78.
5. St. Alphonsus de Liguori,
History of Heresies, Vol. 1., ch. vii., art. 1.
6. Lumen Gentium, 16. Vatican
Council II.,
7. - Roberti-Palazzini,
Dizionario di teologia morale, p.813. Cf. Also A Compendium of St. Thomas's
Theology, by Fr. E. O' Donnell, Vol. II, Dublin 1859, Pg. 21
8a.St. Ignatius of Antioch,
Letter to the Philadelphians, VIII:2
8b. Pascendi, Sept. 8,
1907,
9.
Roberti-Palazzini, Dizionario di teologia morale, p.813.
10.
Dizionario de
teologia morale, p.805.
11. Dizionario de teologia morale, p.805.
11a. The Sacred Congregation of the Propagation of the Faith, Pope St. Pius X, 1907 “In answer to a question as to whether Confucius could have been saved, wrote: ' It is not allowed to affirm that Confucius was saved. Christians, when interrogated, must answer that those who die as infidels are damned.' - The reason for this is as we previously mention. The Church judges the Objective facts and not the subjective dispositions of Men!
12. Lefebvre; Open Letter to
Confused Catholics, Fowler Wright Books Ltd., Herefordshire, England, 1986, p.
106.
13.
Oath Against
Modernism
14. This dogma has been
affirmed many times over by the Churches Magesterium. It has been affirmed by
Pope Innocent III (DS423), The IV Lateran Council (DS 430), Pope Boniface VIII
(DS 468), The Council of Florence (DS 714), Pius IX (DS1647), Pope Clement VI
(DS 5706), The Council of Trent (DS 861).
15a. THE FAITH OF CATHOLICS,
The Introduction, by Frs. Joseph Berington and John Kirk, rev. Fr. James
Waterworth, San Marino, CA: Victory Publications, 1985.
15b. Satis Cognitum, June 19,
1896
15c. Lux et Veritas, December
25, 1931.
16a. Fr. D. I. Lanslot,
Catholic Theology, St. Louise, M O, 1911, Pg. 486.
16b. James Brodrick, S.J., Saint Francis Xavier (Image Book, 1957), p. 85
16c. Fr. E. O'Donnell, A
Compendium of St. Thomas's Theology, Dublin 1859, Volume II, Pg. 113, Cf. Summa Theologica, II-II, QQ. 92-96.
16d. Fr. John R. Bancroft, C.SS. R, Communication in Religious worship with non Catholics, Washington,
1943, pg. 48.
16e. Fr. John R. Bancroft, C.SS. R, Communication in Religious worship with non Catholics, Washington,
1943, pg. 14.
16f. Summa Theologica II-II, q.
81, Art. 1
16g. Suarez, Opera Omnia, Tom
XIII, pg. 7
17a. Our Apostolic Mandate
17b.
Apud. Theod., lib. 4, Hist. Eccl., c. xvii.
18. Pope Pius XI, Mortalium
Animos
19. Pope Leo XIII, Praeclara
Gratulationis., June 20, 1894
20. St. Canisius Catholic
Cate-chism, Dillingen, 1560, Question no. 1
21.
St. Peter Mavimenus, The Roman
Martyrology for February 21
22. "National Catholic
Register," 1974
23. St. Alphonsus de Liguori,
Victories of the Martyrs, ch. LIII.
23a. Saint Francis of Assisi, A biography, by Omer Englebert, 1979, Pg. 178-9
24. St. John Mary Vianney . John Mary: SPIRIT OF THE CURE D'ARS, Bowden, 1864
25. Acerbo Nimis,
April 15, 1905
26. Summa Theologica II - II q.
10, Art. 3
27.
Romans 2:12. Cf. Also
Summa Theologica,
II-II, Q. 11, Art. 1.
29. Fr. Michael Muller,
Catholic Doctrine, preface, pg. 16
30. Summa Contra Gentiles, Book 1, Chapter 16, Art. 4.
32. Opera Omnia, Tom. XXIV, p.
708
33. Fr. John R.
Bancroft, C.SS. R, Communication in Religious worship with non Catholics,
Washington, 1943, pg. 48.
34. Fr. John R. Bancroft, C.SS.
R, Communication in Religious worship with non Catholics, Washington, 1943, pg.
51
35. Epistola LXXXII, ad
Hieronymum, Cap. II, n.18
36. Canon 1258
37. Moral Theology, A Complete
Cource, by John A. Mchugh and Charles J. Callan, New York, 1929, Vol. I. n. 964,
Pg. 376
38. Mortalium Animos
39. God the teacher of Mankind, New York, 1881, Pg. 331
40. Lumen Gentium, 16. Vatican Council II.
41. Quran, Book IX, par. 30, Cf. Sura 9:28, 5:17, 47:4, 5:62